The verdict
Herbie Farnworth has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Herbie Farnworth leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonHerbie Farnworth24%of decided measures8measures wonJack Bostock
Games played: 23 for Herbie Farnworth, 14 for Jack Bostock. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Herbie Farnworth | Jack Bostock |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.57Better | 0.36 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30 | 0.79Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.70 | 0.79Better |
| Points per Game | 2.3Better | 1.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52Better | 0.36 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.87Better | 2.57 |
| Offloads per Game | 3.30Better | 1.07 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.4 | 24.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 5.1 | 5.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.3Better | 144.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 167.8Better | 148.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.7Better | 46.4 |
| Runs per Game | 17.0 | 17.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 8.36 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.17Better | 8.38 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.4 | 16.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.8Better | 84.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4 | 1.0Better |
| Games played | 23 | 14 |