2026 NRL player comparison

Harry GrantvsHohepa Puru

Storm · Hooker versus Sharks · Hooker

Compare another player

The verdict

Harry Grant has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Harry Grant leads by 89%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

18measures wonHarry Grant89%of decided measures1measures wonHohepa Puru

Games played: 21 for Harry Grant, 20 for Hohepa Puru. Compared positions: Hooker.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricStorm logoHarry GrantSharks logoHohepa Puru
Tries per Game0.29Better0.05
Try Assists per Game0.43Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.38Better0.00
Points per Game1.6Better0.2
Line Breaks per Game0.43Better0.05
Tackle Breaks per Game1.43Better0.40
Offloads per Game0.62Better0.05
Possessions per Game116.8Better26.4
Passes per Game109.5Better23.5
Run Metres per Game57.7Better22.0
Metres Gained per Game132.9Better22.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game10.0Better6.6
Runs per Game8.0Better2.8
Metres per Run7.177.86Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.33
Tackles per Game39.8Better14.8
Tackle Efficiency90.6Better87.3
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.07Better0.11
Conversion Accuracy50.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Dummy-Half Runs per Game7.0Better0.5
Dummy-Half Metres per Game52.1Better3.4
Games played2120