The verdict
Harrison Graham has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Harrison Graham leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonHarrison Graham16%of decided measures8measures wonPhoenix Crossland
Games played: 19 for Harrison Graham, 22 for Phoenix Crossland. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Harrison Graham | Phoenix Crossland |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.11 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.09 |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 0.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.16Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.58Better | 0.14 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.05 |
| Possessions per Game | 38.3 | 77.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 35.7 | 74.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 28.5Better | 11.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 35.6 | 53.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 9.9Better | 2.3 |
| Runs per Game | 2.2Better | 1.4 |
| Metres per Run | 12.90Better | 8.50 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 5.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 21.1 | 44.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.9 | 91.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 1.3Better | 0.4 |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 18.5Better | 3.8 |
| Games played | 19 | 22 |