The verdict
Payne Haas has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Payne Haas leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
0measures wonGriffin Neame100%of decided measures18measures wonPayne Haas
Games played: 22 for Griffin Neame, 17 for Payne Haas. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Griffin Neame |  Payne Haas |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.18Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.06Better |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 4.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09 | 1.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.9 | 16.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.5 | 2.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6 | 146.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 73.6 | 146.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5 | 62.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.1 | 14.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.10 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.72 | 9.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 22.5 | 37.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 95.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 22 | 17 |