The verdict
Junior Paulo has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Junior Paulo leads by 79%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
2measures wonGriffin Neame79%of decided measures17measures wonJunior Paulo
Games played: 22 for Griffin Neame, 17 for Junior Paulo. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Griffin Neame |  Junior Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.12Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.12Better |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 1.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09 | 0.82Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.9 | 16.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.5 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6 | 102.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 73.6 | 102.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5 | 35.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.1 | 12.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.10Better | 8.41 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.72Better | 8.06 |
| Tackles per Game | 22.5 | 23.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 90.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.07Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 22 | 17 |