The verdict
Griffin Neame has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Griffin Neame leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonGriffin Neame22%of decided measures7measures wonJohn Radel
Games played: 22 for Griffin Neame, 7 for John Radel. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Griffin Neame |  John Radel |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 1.1Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 0.43Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 8.9Better | 5.0 |
| Passes per Game | 0.5Better | 0.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6Better | 43.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 73.6Better | 43.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5Better | 13.4 |
| Runs per Game | 8.1Better | 4.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.10Better | 8.88 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.72Better | 6.30 |
| Tackles per Game | 22.5Better | 12.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 89.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Games played | 22 | 7 |