The verdict
Jackson Ford has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Jackson Ford leads by 78%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
2measures wonGriffin Neame78%of decided measures16measures wonJackson Ford
Games played: 22 for Griffin Neame, 14 for Jackson Ford. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Griffin Neame |  Jackson Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.43Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 2.29Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09 | 0.64Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.9 | 19.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.5 | 1.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6 | 153.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 73.6 | 154.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5 | 63.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.1 | 17.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.10Better | 8.79 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.72 | 9.11Better |
| Tackles per Game | 22.5 | 43.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 90.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Games played | 22 | 14 |