The verdict
Fonua Pole has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Fonua Pole leads by 63%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonFonua Pole63%of decided measures3measures wonPreston Riki
Games played: 24 for Fonua Pole, 10 for Preston Riki. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.92Better | 0.80 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.04 | 0.50Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.4Better | 8.8 |
| Passes per Game | 1.5Better | 0.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 112.0Better | 66.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 112.0Better | 67.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.3Better | 24.1 |
| Runs per Game | 11.8Better | 8.2 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 8.06 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.36Better | 8.06 |
| Tackles per Game | 26.2Better | 23.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.9 | 94.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 24 | 10 |