2026 NRL player comparison

Fletcher SharpevsStephen Crichton

Knights · Five-Eighth versus Bulldogs · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Fletcher Sharpe has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonFletcher Sharpe33%of decided measures7measures wonStephen Crichton

Games played: 22 for Fletcher Sharpe, 20 for Stephen Crichton. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoFletcher SharpeBulldogs logoStephen Crichton
Tries per Game0.55Better0.35
Try Assists per Game0.50Better0.45
Line Break Assists per Game0.73Better0.55
Points per Game2.26.7Better
Line Breaks per Game0.59Better0.45
Tackle Breaks per Game3.18Better1.80
Offloads per Game0.680.95Better
Possessions per Game40.9Better30.5
Passes per Game29.0Better16.0
Run Metres per Game105.6Better89.3
Metres Gained per Game140.4259.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game35.6Better33.5
Runs per Game10.5Better8.7
Metres per Run10.1010.26Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.5010.85Better
Tackles per Game17.5Better13.2
Tackle Efficiency86.3Better78.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.09Better0.18
Conversion Accuracy73.7
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.04
Kicks per Game1.34.8Better
Kick Metres per Game34.8170.6Better
Games played2220