The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonFletcher Hunt50%of decided measures15measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 24 for Fletcher Hunt, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Fletcher Hunt |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.54 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.21Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.2 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.50 | 0.61Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.88 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.71 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 12.2 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.8 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 76.5 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 18.5 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.1 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.13 | 9.37Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 6.41 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 8.3Better | 5.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.6 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.17Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 14.9 | 18.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.9 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 24 | 18 |