2026 NRL player comparison

Fetalaiga PaugavsLeka Halasima

Roosters · Centre versus Warriors · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Leka Halasima has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonFetalaiga Pauga30%of decided measures13measures wonLeka Halasima

Games played: 6 for Fetalaiga Pauga, 20 for Leka Halasima. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoFetalaiga PaugaWarriors logoLeka Halasima
Tries per Game0.000.40Better
Try Assists per Game0.33Better0.10
Line Break Assists per Game0.50Better0.15
Points per Game0.01.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.170.35Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.503.60Better
Offloads per Game0.33Better0.20
Possessions per Game11.811.9Better
Passes per Game2.5Better1.3
Run Metres per Game80.590.8Better
Metres Gained per Game88.090.8Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game24.837.7Better
Runs per Game8.39.8Better
Metres per Run9.66Better9.31
Metres per Hit-Up9.14Better8.82
Tackles per Game11.218.1Better
Tackle Efficiency77.983.4Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.220.16Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.100.08Better
Kick Returns per Game0.5Better0.2
Bombs Caught per Game0.20.2
Games played620