The verdict
Ezra Mam has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Ezra Mam leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonEzra Mam70%of decided measures3measures wonLuke Hanson
Games played: 22 for Ezra Mam, 7 for Luke Hanson. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ezra Mam |  Luke Hanson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.45Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.55Better | 0.29 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.43 |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.64Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.77Better | 0.71 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.27Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 31.5Better | 12.6 |
| Passes per Game | 21.8Better | 9.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 80.0Better | 16.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 119.8Better | 35.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 21.6Better | 5.3 |
| Runs per Game | 8.5Better | 2.3 |
| Metres per Run | 9.36Better | 7.19 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 11.50 | – |
| Tackles per Game | 16.5Better | 8.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 74.2 | 86.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.29 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 2.0Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 39.8Better | 19.4 |
| Games played | 22 | 7 |