2026 NRL player comparison

Ethan StrangevsEzra Mam

Raiders · Five-Eighth versus Broncos · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonEthan Strange0%of decided measures10measures wonEzra Mam

Games played: 21 for Ethan Strange, 22 for Ezra Mam. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRaiders logoEthan StrangeBroncos logoEzra Mam
Tries per Game0.330.45Better
Try Assists per Game0.480.55Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.480.50Better
Points per Game1.31.8Better
Line Breaks per Game0.520.64Better
Tackle Breaks per Game3.86Better1.77
Offloads per Game0.90Better0.27
Possessions per Game30.631.5Better
Passes per Game22.0Better21.8
Run Metres per Game69.880.0Better
Metres Gained per Game136.5Better119.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game19.521.6Better
Runs per Game8.08.5Better
Metres per Run8.679.36Better
Metres per Hit-Up11.50
Tackles per Game19.2Better16.5
Tackle Efficiency87.0Better74.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.10Better0.29
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.04
Kicks per Game2.1Better2.0
Kick Metres per Game66.8Better39.8
Games played2122