The verdict
Enari Tuala has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Enari Tuala leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonEnari Tuala70%of decided measures3measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 20 for Enari Tuala, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Enari Tuala |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.65Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.95Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.9Better | 14.6 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.5Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.0Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.3Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 15.9Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.80Better | 8.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49 | 8.22Better |
| Tackles per Game | 13.1Better | 9.5 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.3Better | 81.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 10.9Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Games played | 20 | 21 |