The verdict
Enari Tuala has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Enari Tuala leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonEnari Tuala24%of decided measures8measures wonMoses Leo
Games played: 20 for Enari Tuala, 17 for Moses Leo. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Enari Tuala |  Moses Leo |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.65Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 2.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.65 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.95 | 3.65Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40Better | 0.12 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.9Better | 14.4 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 2.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.5Better | 123.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.0Better | 125.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.3Better | 42.8 |
| Runs per Game | 15.9Better | 11.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.80 | 10.86Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49 | 9.21Better |
| Tackles per Game | 13.1Better | 6.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.3Better | 71.1 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 10.9 | 20.7Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 20 | 17 |