The verdict
Enari Tuala has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Enari Tuala leads by 9%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonEnari Tuala9%of decided measures10measures wonFletcher Hunt
Games played: 20 for Enari Tuala, 24 for Fletcher Hunt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Enari Tuala |  Fletcher Hunt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.54Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.21Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 2.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.65Better | 0.50 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.95Better | 1.88 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40 | 0.71Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.9Better | 12.2 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.5Better | 73.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.0Better | 76.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.3Better | 18.5 |
| Runs per Game | 15.9Better | 8.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.80 | 9.13Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49Better | 6.41 |
| Tackles per Game | 13.1Better | 8.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.3Better | 78.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 10.9 | 14.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 20 | 24 |