The verdict
Tino Fa'asuamaleaui has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tino Fa'asuamaleaui leads by 58%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonEmre Guler58%of decided measures15measures wonTino Fa'asuamaleaui
Games played: 19 for Emre Guler, 21 for Tino Fa'asuamaleaui. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Emre Guler |  Tino Fa'asuamaleaui |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.42 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.3 | 19.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.8 | 140.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 60.8 | 140.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 20.1 | 56.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.8 | 16.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.88Better | 8.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96 | 9.12Better |
| Tackles per Game | 23.8 | 33.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.2Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 19 | 21 |