The verdict
Payne Haas has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Payne Haas leads by 89%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
1measures wonEmre Guler89%of decided measures17measures wonPayne Haas
Games played: 19 for Emre Guler, 17 for Payne Haas. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Emre Guler |  Payne Haas |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.18Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53 | 4.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.42 | 1.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.3 | 16.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 2.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.8 | 146.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 60.8 | 146.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 20.1 | 62.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.8 | 14.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.88 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96 | 9.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 23.8 | 37.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.2 | 95.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.01 |
| Games played | 19 | 17 |