The verdict
Noah Martin has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Noah Martin leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava16%of decided measures11measures wonNoah Martin
Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 11 for Noah Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava |  Noah Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 1.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.76 | 2.18Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41Better | 0.18 |
| Possessions per Game | 8.4 | 10.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 62.3 | 70.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 70.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.5 | 26.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.0 | 8.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.90Better | 8.65 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48Better | 7.80 |
| Tackles per Game | 18.9 | 39.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.2Better | 90.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 17 | 11 |