The verdict
Kurt Capewell has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kurt Capewell leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava37%of decided measures13measures wonKurt Capewell
Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 13 for Kurt Capewell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava | Kurt Capewell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.15Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.23 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.15 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 0.23Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.76 | 1.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41 | 0.62Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.4 | 13.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 62.3 | 76.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 80.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.5 | 29.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.0 | 9.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.90Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48 | 8.67Better |
| Tackles per Game | 18.9 | 29.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.2Better | 86.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 17 | 13 |