The verdict
Eddie Ieremia-Toeava has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Eddie Ieremia-Toeava leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava47%of decided measures5measures wonJohn Bateman
Games played: 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava, 7 for John Bateman. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava |  John Bateman |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.24Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18 | 0.29Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.76Better | 0.57 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41 | 0.43Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.4Better | 7.4 |
| Passes per Game | 1.1Better | 0.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 62.3Better | 54.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3Better | 55.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.5Better | 17.7 |
| Runs per Game | 7.0Better | 6.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.90Better | 8.84 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48 | 8.94Better |
| Tackles per Game | 18.9Better | 17.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.2Better | 90.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 17 | 7 |