The verdict
Dean Ieremia has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Dean Ieremia leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonDean Ieremia18%of decided measures9measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 5 for Dean Ieremia, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dean Ieremia |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.10Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.8Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.20 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.19Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.6Better | 14.6 |
| Passes per Game | 1.8 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 131.8Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 131.8Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 43.2Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 15.8Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 8.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.98 | 8.22Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.0 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.3Better | 81.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.2Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 23.4Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Games played | 5 | 21 |