The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonDean Ieremia33%of decided measures14measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 5 for Dean Ieremia, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dean Ieremia |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.8 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.20 | 0.61Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.6 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.8Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 131.8 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 131.8 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 43.2 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 15.8Better | 14.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 9.37Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.98 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.0 | 5.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.3Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.2Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 23.4Better | 18.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 5 | 18 |