The verdict
Dean Ieremia has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Dean Ieremia leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonDean Ieremia20%of decided measures8measures wonJethro Rinakama
Games played: 5 for Dean Ieremia, 15 for Jethro Rinakama. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dean Ieremia |  Jethro Rinakama |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.47Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.8 | 1.9Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.20 | 0.73Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20 | 2.67Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.6Better | 14.5 |
| Passes per Game | 1.8Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 131.8Better | 110.7 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 131.8Better | 110.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 43.2Better | 37.3 |
| Runs per Game | 15.8Better | 12.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 9.23Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.98Better | 7.48 |
| Tackles per Game | 4.0Better | 3.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.3 | 87.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.10 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.2Better | 1.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 23.4Better | 19.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 1.0Better |
| Games played | 5 | 15 |