The verdict
David Fifita has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, David Fifita leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonDavid Fifita26%of decided measures7measures wonKai Pearce-Paul
Games played: 16 for David Fifita, 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  David Fifita |  Kai Pearce-Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.33 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.25Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.19 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.44Better | 0.08 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 0.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.38 | 2.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.7Better | 12.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 2.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.3Better | 68.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 136.3Better | 69.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.6Better | 24.6 |
| Runs per Game | 15.3Better | 8.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68Better | 7.72 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94Better | 7.79 |
| Tackles per Game | 22.1 | 35.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.9 | 91.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 16 | 12 |