The verdict
David Fifita has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, David Fifita leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonDavid Fifita26%of decided measures7measures wonJeremiah Nanai
Games played: 16 for David Fifita, 9 for Jeremiah Nanai. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  David Fifita |  Jeremiah Nanai |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.19Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.5 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.44Better | 0.33 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 2.11 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.38Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.7Better | 10.9 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4Better | 0.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.3Better | 98.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 136.3Better | 98.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.6Better | 42.7 |
| Runs per Game | 15.3Better | 9.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68 | 9.99Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94 | 10.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 22.1 | 27.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.9 | 90.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 16 | 9 |