The verdict
David Fifita has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, David Fifita leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonDavid Fifita44%of decided measures5measures wonJacob Laban
Games played: 16 for David Fifita, 24 for Jacob Laban. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  David Fifita |  Jacob Laban |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.33 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.19Better | 0.04 |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.44 | 0.46Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 2.21 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.38Better | 0.50 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.7Better | 11.4 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.3Better | 73.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 136.3Better | 75.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.6Better | 26.5 |
| Runs per Game | 15.3Better | 8.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68Better | 8.45 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94Better | 7.81 |
| Tackles per Game | 22.1 | 27.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.9 | 89.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.08 |
| Games played | 16 | 24 |