The verdict
David Fifita has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, David Fifita leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonDavid Fifita44%of decided measures5measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava
Games played: 16 for David Fifita, 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  David Fifita |  Eddie Ieremia-Toeava |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.24Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.19 | 0.24Better |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.44Better | 0.18 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 0.76 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.38Better | 0.41 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.7Better | 8.4 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.3Better | 62.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 136.3Better | 62.3 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.6Better | 22.5 |
| Runs per Game | 15.3Better | 7.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68 | 8.90Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94Better | 8.48 |
| Tackles per Game | 22.1Better | 18.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.9 | 91.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 16 | 17 |