The verdict
Selwyn Cobbo has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Selwyn Cobbo leads by 73%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonDaniel Tupou73%of decided measures19measures wonSelwyn Cobbo
Games played: 14 for Daniel Tupou, 18 for Selwyn Cobbo. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.93 | 0.94Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Points per Game | 3.7 | 3.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.71 | 1.22Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.93 | 3.89Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50Better | 0.44 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.8 | 22.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 4.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 142.6 | 175.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 143.2 | 181.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.9 | 59.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.3 | 17.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.98 | 10.24Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.34 | 8.37Better |
| Tackles per Game | 1.6 | 4.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 65.7 | 79.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.39 | 0.20Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.10 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.5 | 4.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 42.1 | 44.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.2Better | 1.0 |
| Games played | 14 | 18 |