The verdict
Lehi Hopoate has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Lehi Hopoate leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonDaniel Tupou36%of decided measures15measures wonLehi Hopoate
Games played: 14 for Daniel Tupou, 23 for Lehi Hopoate. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Daniel Tupou |  Lehi Hopoate |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.93Better | 0.83 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.22Better |
| Points per Game | 3.7Better | 3.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.71 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.93 | 2.78Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50 | 0.74Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.8 | 23.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 4.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 142.6 | 160.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 143.2 | 162.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.9 | 51.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.3 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.98Better | 9.48 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.34Better | 7.98 |
| Tackles per Game | 1.6 | 6.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 65.7 | 70.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.39 | 0.29Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.5Better | 2.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 42.1Better | 27.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.2Better | 0.9 |
| Games played | 14 | 23 |