2026 NRL player comparison

Daniel AtkinsonvsSualauvi Fa'alogo

Dragons · Fullback versus Storm · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

Sualauvi Fa'alogo has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Sualauvi Fa'alogo leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonDaniel Atkinson36%of decided measures15measures wonSualauvi Fa'alogo

Games played: 23 for Daniel Atkinson, 24 for Sualauvi Fa'alogo. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoDaniel AtkinsonStorm logoSualauvi Fa'alogo
Tries per Game0.040.75Better
Try Assists per Game0.390.63Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.300.92Better
Points per Game0.23.9Better
Line Breaks per Game0.220.96Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.785.17Better
Offloads per Game0.521.08Better
Possessions per Game45.6Better31.7
Passes per Game24.5Better12.6
Run Metres per Game61.0185.9Better
Metres Gained per Game568.7Better200.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game20.553.2Better
Runs per Game7.318.5Better
Metres per Run8.3510.05Better
Metres per Hit-Up10.67Better9.75
Tackles per Game16.0Better4.5
Tackle Efficiency76.8Better64.5
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.21Better0.48
Conversion Accuracy56.3
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.02Better
Kick Returns per Game1.55.8Better
Kick Return Metres per Game14.560.8Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.62.2Better
Games played2324