2026 NRL player comparison

Daniel AtkinsonvsScott Drinkwater

Dragons · Fullback versus Cowboys · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

Scott Drinkwater has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Scott Drinkwater leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonDaniel Atkinson52%of decided measures16measures wonScott Drinkwater

Games played: 23 for Daniel Atkinson, 24 for Scott Drinkwater. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoDaniel AtkinsonCowboys logoScott Drinkwater
Tries per Game0.040.42Better
Try Assists per Game0.390.96Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.301.13Better
Points per Game0.24.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.220.42Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.783.00Better
Offloads per Game0.521.13Better
Possessions per Game45.649.3Better
Passes per Game24.530.3Better
Run Metres per Game61.0140.2Better
Metres Gained per Game568.7Better258.0
Post-Contact Metres per Game20.531.8Better
Runs per Game7.316.7Better
Metres per Run8.358.39Better
Metres per Hit-Up10.67Better5.00
Tackles per Game16.0Better5.3
Tackle Efficiency76.8Better69.8
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.21Better0.36
Conversion Accuracy92.6
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.03
Kick Returns per Game1.55.0Better
Kick Return Metres per Game14.547.6Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.61.9Better
Games played2324