The verdict
Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonDaniel Atkinson43%of decided measures15measures wonHamiso Tabuai-Fidow
Games played: 23 for Daniel Atkinson, 19 for Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Daniel Atkinson |  Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.68Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.39 | 0.53Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.30 | 0.74Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 2.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 0.68Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.78 | 3.63Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.52 | 0.68Better |
| Possessions per Game | 45.6Better | 36.3 |
| Passes per Game | 24.5Better | 21.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 61.0 | 171.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 568.7Better | 171.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 20.5 | 52.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.3 | 15.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.35 | 11.33Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.67Better | 9.09 |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 5.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 76.8 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.21Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5 | 5.0Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 14.5 | 63.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 1.9Better |
| Games played | 23 | 19 |