The verdict
Dane Gagai has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Dane Gagai leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonDane Gagai16%of decided measures8measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dane Gagai |  Roger Tuivasa-Sheck |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.45 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.40 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.40 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 2.10 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.09Better | 0.30 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.5Better | 20.8 |
| Passes per Game | 7.1Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 114.5 | 139.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 121.0 | 144.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.8 | 46.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.4 | 15.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.54 | 9.13Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.90Better | 7.75 |
| Tackles per Game | 14.3Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.3Better | 75.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Games played | 22 | 10 |