2026 NRL player comparison

Dane GagaivsPatrick Herbert

Knights · Centre versus Wests Tigers · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Dane Gagai has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Dane Gagai leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

15measures wonDane Gagai43%of decided measures6measures wonPatrick Herbert

Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 14 for Patrick Herbert. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoDane GagaiWests Tigers logoPatrick Herbert
Tries per Game0.23Better0.07
Try Assists per Game0.450.50Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.82Better0.50
Points per Game0.9Better0.4
Line Breaks per Game0.45Better0.21
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better1.79
Offloads per Game1.09Better0.43
Possessions per Game21.5Better13.9
Passes per Game7.1Better3.7
Run Metres per Game114.5Better87.6
Metres Gained per Game121.0Better87.6
Post-Contact Metres per Game42.8Better30.3
Runs per Game13.4Better10.1
Metres per Run8.548.70Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.908.27Better
Tackles per Game14.3Better12.0
Tackle Efficiency78.382.0Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.220.16Better
Conversion Accuracy100.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.05Better
Kick Returns per Game0.2Better0.0
Bombs Caught per Game0.2Better0.0
Games played2214