The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonDane Gagai20%of decided measures12measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dane Gagai |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23 | 0.39Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.45Better | 0.35 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.61 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45 | 0.57Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 2.96 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.09Better | 0.61 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.5 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 7.1 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 114.5 | 122.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 121.0 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.8Better | 42.3 |
| Runs per Game | 13.4Better | 13.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.54 | 9.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.90Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 14.3 | 16.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.3 | 81.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.15Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 22 | 23 |