The verdict
Dane Gagai has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Dane Gagai leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonDane Gagai40%of decided measures6measures wonLuke Garner
Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 18 for Luke Garner. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dane Gagai |  Luke Garner |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.45Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 0.9Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 1.28 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.09Better | 0.28 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.5Better | 8.9 |
| Passes per Game | 7.1Better | 1.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 114.5Better | 65.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 121.0Better | 67.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.8Better | 26.6 |
| Runs per Game | 13.4Better | 7.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.54 | 9.02Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.90 | 9.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 14.3 | 20.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.3 | 89.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 22 | 18 |