The verdict
Dane Gagai has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Dane Gagai leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonDane Gagai5%of decided measures10measures wonJack Howarth
Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 17 for Jack Howarth. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Dane Gagai |  Jack Howarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23 | 0.35Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.45Better | 0.18 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.29 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 1.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 3.59 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.09Better | 0.59 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.5Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 7.1Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 114.5 | 126.4Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 121.0 | 128.4Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.8 | 44.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.4 | 14.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.54Better | 8.49 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.90 | 8.28Better |
| Tackles per Game | 14.3Better | 11.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.3 | 79.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.16Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 22 | 17 |