2026 NRL player comparison

Connor TraceyvsJames Tedesco

Bulldogs · Fullback versus Roosters · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

James Tedesco has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 55%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonConnor Tracey55%of decided measures17measures wonJames Tedesco

Games played: 22 for Connor Tracey, 17 for James Tedesco. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricBulldogs logoConnor TraceyRoosters logoJames Tedesco
Tries per Game0.180.65Better
Try Assists per Game0.230.82Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.320.53Better
Points per Game0.72.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.410.88Better
Tackle Breaks per Game2.953.82Better
Offloads per Game1.001.59Better
Possessions per Game33.435.1Better
Passes per Game14.317.6Better
Run Metres per Game171.8192.2Better
Metres Gained per Game176.4201.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game41.852.9Better
Runs per Game19.1Better19.0
Metres per Run9.0010.12Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.17Better7.00
Tackles per Game2.83.3Better
Tackle Efficiency63.376.7Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.500.23Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.02Better
Kick Returns per Game7.6Better4.6
Kick Return Metres per Game82.8Better50.5
Bombs Caught per Game1.9Better1.2
Games played2217