The verdict
Tino Fa'asuamaleaui has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tino Fa'asuamaleaui leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonCoen Hess47%of decided measures14measures wonTino Fa'asuamaleaui
Games played: 24 for Coen Hess, 21 for Tino Fa'asuamaleaui. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Coen Hess |  Tino Fa'asuamaleaui |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.96 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.46 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.2 | 19.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.3 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 78.5 | 140.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 78.5 | 140.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 28.0 | 56.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.9 | 16.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.97Better | 8.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.35Better | 9.12 |
| Tackles per Game | 25.8 | 33.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.4Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |