The verdict
Payne Haas has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Payne Haas leads by 89%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
1measures wonCoen Hess89%of decided measures17measures wonPayne Haas
Games played: 24 for Coen Hess, 17 for Payne Haas. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Coen Hess |  Payne Haas |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.18Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.96 | 4.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.46 | 1.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.2 | 16.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.3 | 2.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 78.5 | 146.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 78.5 | 146.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 28.0 | 62.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.9 | 14.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.97Better | 9.92 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.35 | 9.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 25.8 | 37.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.4 | 95.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 24 | 17 |