2026 NRL player comparison

Cody RamseyvsJames Tedesco

Roosters · Fullback versus Roosters · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

James Tedesco has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 82%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

2measures wonCody Ramsey82%of decided measures20measures wonJames Tedesco

Games played: 21 for Cody Ramsey, 17 for James Tedesco. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoCody RamseyRoosters logoJames Tedesco
Tries per Game0.100.65Better
Try Assists per Game0.330.82Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.290.53Better
Points per Game0.62.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.520.88Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.713.82Better
Offloads per Game0.051.59Better
Possessions per Game13.735.1Better
Passes per Game4.817.6Better
Run Metres per Game89.0192.2Better
Metres Gained per Game91.2201.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game25.252.9Better
Runs per Game8.419.0Better
Metres per Run10.55Better10.12
Metres per Hit-Up6.607.00Better
Tackles per Game2.53.3Better
Tackle Efficiency76.8Better76.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.250.23Better
Conversion Accuracy100.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.02Better
Kick Returns per Game2.84.6Better
Kick Return Metres per Game38.550.5Better
Bombs Caught per Game1.01.2Better
Games played2117