2026 NRL player comparison

Clint GuthersonvsJames Tedesco

Dragons · Fullback versus Roosters · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

James Tedesco has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonClint Gutherson27%of decided measures14measures wonJames Tedesco

Games played: 17 for Clint Gutherson, 17 for James Tedesco. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoClint GuthersonRoosters logoJames Tedesco
Tries per Game0.180.65Better
Try Assists per Game0.350.82Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.82Better0.53
Points per Game0.72.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.240.88Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.243.82Better
Offloads per Game1.001.59Better
Possessions per Game39.7Better35.1
Passes per Game22.3Better17.6
Run Metres per Game144.9192.2Better
Metres Gained per Game157.5201.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game31.352.9Better
Runs per Game16.419.0Better
Metres per Run8.8310.12Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.87Better7.00
Tackles per Game6.1Better3.3
Tackle Efficiency74.676.7Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.240.23Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.02Better
Kick Returns per Game5.1Better4.6
Kick Return Metres per Game53.5Better50.5
Bombs Caught per Game2.1Better1.2
Games played1717