The verdict
Trent Loiero has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Trent Loiero leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonChris Randall22%of decided measures11measures wonTrent Loiero
Games played: 21 for Chris Randall, 21 for Trent Loiero. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Chris Randall |  Trent Loiero |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.67 | 1.43Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.05 | 0.86Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.1 | 19.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 9.6Better | 9.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.1 | 85.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.0 | 88.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 23.6 | 29.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 7.5 | 10.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.04Better | 7.95 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.44 | 8.50Better |
| Tackles per Game | 30.9 | 36.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.6Better | 91.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 21 | 21 |