The verdict
Connor Watson has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Connor Watson leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonChris Randall6%of decided measures9measures wonConnor Watson
Games played: 21 for Chris Randall, 24 for Connor Watson. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05Better | 0.04 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.13Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.67 | 1.08Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.05 | 0.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.1 | 27.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 9.6 | 20.8Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.1Better | 55.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.0Better | 60.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 23.6Better | 19.5 |
| Runs per Game | 7.5Better | 6.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.04 | 8.18Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.44 | 9.19Better |
| Tackles per Game | 30.9Better | 25.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.6 | 94.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 21 | 24 |