2026 NRL player comparison

Chris RandallvsConnor Watson

Titans · Lock versus Roosters · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Connor Watson has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Connor Watson leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonChris Randall6%of decided measures9measures wonConnor Watson

Games played: 21 for Chris Randall, 24 for Connor Watson. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricTitans logoChris RandallRoosters logoConnor Watson
Tries per Game0.05Better0.04
Try Assists per Game0.050.08Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.100.13Better
Points per Game0.20.2
Line Breaks per Game0.10Better0.04
Tackle Breaks per Game0.671.08Better
Offloads per Game0.050.33Better
Possessions per Game17.127.5Better
Passes per Game9.620.8Better
Run Metres per Game60.1Better55.9
Metres Gained per Game62.0Better60.7
Post-Contact Metres per Game23.6Better19.5
Runs per Game7.5Better6.8
Metres per Run8.048.18Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.449.19Better
Tackles per Game30.9Better25.9
Tackle Efficiency92.694.2Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.040.04
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Games played2124