The verdict
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad36%of decided measures7measures wonMoses Leo
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 17 for Moses Leo. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |  Moses Leo |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80Better | 0.65 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.2Better | 2.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67 | 3.65Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.12 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7Better | 14.4 |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 2.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1 | 123.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1 | 125.4Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 42.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.3Better | 11.4 |
| Metres per Run | 9.28 | 10.86Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24 | 9.21Better |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 6.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7Better | 71.1 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5Better | 1.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7Better | 20.7 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 15 | 17 |