The verdict
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad5%of decided measures10measures wonJunior Tupou
Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 7 for Junior Tupou. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad |  Junior Tupou |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.80Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 3.2Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.80Better | 0.57 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67 | 2.71Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.43 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.7Better | 18.0 |
| Passes per Game | 7.5Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.1 | 149.4Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.1 | 152.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 52.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.3 | 14.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.28 | 10.06Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.24 | 9.50Better |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 4.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.7Better | 75.7 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.21 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.5 | 3.0Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 25.7 | 32.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Games played | 15 | 7 |