2026 NRL player comparison

Charnze Nicoll-KlokstadvsDaniel Tupou

Warriors · Wing versus Roosters · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

11measures wonCharnze Nicoll-Klokstad0%of decided measures11measures wonDaniel Tupou

Games played: 15 for Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 14 for Daniel Tupou. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoCharnze Nicoll-KlokstadRoosters logoDaniel Tupou
Tries per Game0.800.93Better
Try Assists per Game0.20Better0.14
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Points per Game3.23.7Better
Line Breaks per Game0.80Better0.71
Tackle Breaks per Game2.67Better1.93
Offloads per Game0.80Better0.50
Possessions per Game21.7Better18.8
Passes per Game7.5Better3.0
Run Metres per Game123.1142.6Better
Metres Gained per Game125.1143.2Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game37.347.9Better
Runs per Game13.314.3Better
Metres per Run9.289.98Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.248.34Better
Tackles per Game9.9Better1.6
Tackle Efficiency82.7Better65.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.15Better0.39
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.03Better0.05
Kick Returns per Game2.53.5Better
Kick Return Metres per Game25.742.1Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.61.2Better
Games played1514