The verdict
Casey McLean has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Casey McLean leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonCasey McLean14%of decided measures9measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 18 for Casey McLean, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Casey McLean | Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.61Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.56Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.83Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 2.4Better | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.67Better | 0.52 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.89 | 3.19Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.56 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.3Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 4.2Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.2Better | 129.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.7Better | 132.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.7 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.3Better | 13.8 |
| Metres per Run | 9.22 | 9.40Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.70 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 14.8Better | 13.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 77.6 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.24 | 0.22Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 18 | 21 |