The verdict
Latrell Mitchell has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Latrell Mitchell leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonCasey McLean43%of decided measures15measures wonLatrell Mitchell
Games played: 18 for Casey McLean, 11 for Latrell Mitchell. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Casey McLean |  Latrell Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.61 | 1.09Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.56 | 0.82Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.83 | 1.64Better |
| Points per Game | 2.4 | 12.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.67 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.89 | 4.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.56 | 2.27Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.3 | 26.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.2 | 10.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.2Better | 110.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.7 | 285.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.7Better | 38.2 |
| Runs per Game | 14.3Better | 10.3 |
| Metres per Run | 9.22 | 10.74Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.70 | 8.76Better |
| Tackles per Game | 14.8Better | 8.5 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 77.6 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.24 | 0.12Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 61.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 80.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 18 | 11 |